The Ultimate Guide to Buying a Computer for Blender

Ever since I started Blender Guru I’ve had countless emails from people asking me for advice on what PC they should buy. We’ve all bought PC lemons in the past, so I can see why this would be a common question.

Now before we move on, let me start by saying that your PC is only as good as your skill. If you’re bad at Blender then buying a $4000 computer isn’t likely to help you much. But if you constantly find blender crashing due to the size of your scene, or the poor rendertimes are stunting your potential, then an upgrade may be in order.

Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s talk about getting a PC specifically built for Blender…

Operating System

Photo by fosk

Everyone has their own preferences in terms of usablity and stability, but for me the winner is Linux. In the past I’ve used blender on both Windows and Linux, and I found that Linux crashes less, handles memory better and generally runs more smoothly than a windows operating system.

However… what most users don’t tell you is that Ubuntu can be a royal pain in the arse to use.

If you come from a windows background (like me) then expect to be punching holes in the wall when you find out that you need to learn complex commands in the terminal just to connect to a wired LAN. It really is like entering another world. Everything is done differently and tasks that would usually take 2 seconds in Windows to setup could take hours to learn in Linux. A technical savvy person may say that Linux is a piece of cake, but to me it was an absolute nightmare.

So for that reason I actually recommend Windows 7. It’s fast, easy to use and comes with 99% less headaches than Linux.

EDIT January 2013: I’m hoping to try Linux again in the next few months. If my position on this matter changes I’ll update this post… if I don’t then you’ll know where I stand.

Graphics Card

Updated: 13th January 2013 for Cycles

Before the Cycles rendering engine came about, owning a high end GPU card didn’t have many benefits outside of being able to sculpt really, really high poly meshes. But now that Cycles has swooped into the scene, the GPU is now the most important factor when buying a computer for Blender.

Cycles thrives on the GPU. Yes, it can render on the CPU as well, but the GPU is immensely faster.

This Lamborghini is to your car, what your GPU is to your CPU; much faster.

This Lamborghini is to your car, what your GPU is to your CPU; much faster.

The brand I recommend is Nvidia, because that’s actually the only brand that currently works with Cycles. AMD/ATI cards are dead in the water as far as Cycles is concerned. According to the developers, development can’t continue due to current AMD driver limitations. So save yourself a whole lotta heartache and buy Nvidia.

Secondly, choose a card that has lots of memory. This is important because the biggest downside to GPU rendering is that crashes frequently in complex scenes due to lack of memory. Which means you’ll have to switch to your CPU in order to continue, which is obviously a lot slower. So in a nutshell, the more memory you have, the more textures, geometry and overall complexity you can have in your scene while still rendering on the GPU.

Also, if you’ve got the cash then dual cards will reportedly increase rendertimes by 1.6x. It’s twice the money (obviously), but Cycles does support it and it does pay off in rendertimes. However you’ll still be limited to a single cards memory as dual cards don’t increase the available memory.

I also highly recommend reading this Blender Cycles GPU FAQ which answers a lot of questions that may be buzzing around your head right now.

CPU

Photo by Friedemann Wulff-Woesten

When you aren’t rendering on your GPU, you’ll be falling back on your CPU. So having a strong CPU can save you in rendertimes for complex scenes.

You’ll want a CPU with the most multiple cores as this will allow blender to render more tiles simultaneously. My current CPU has 8 cores, which means blender will render 8 tiles simultaneously. This really pays off in render times.

Cores = Like having multiple CPUs and only paying for one.

Other than that there’s really no secret to choosing a CPU. Buy the fastest that you can afford.

RAM

Photo by Heather Greene

Another very important part to consider is the RAM. Whilst it won’t effect your render times, RAM will set the limit on how “epic” your scene can be. Now when I say “epic”, I’m really talking about memory usage limits. Everytime you use a large image texture or bake a high resolution simulation you use up RAM. And when you run out or RAM, blender crashes.

Thanks for reminding me to purchase more RAM!

This is especially true for simulations (fluid, smoke, cloth etc.) as this directly impacts how “detailed” your simulation can be. If you had only 2GB of RAM and created a fluid simulation, you may only be able to use a domain resolution level of 100 before blender crashed. But if you upgraded to 16GB you may be able to reach 200.

And who knows, in the future you may even reach over 9000!

You can only go as far as your RAM. So if you’re a sim junkie or you plan to use lots of textures and render on the CPU instead of GPU, then load up on the RAM.

Case

Photo by Adamcha

You may laugh at why this is on the list, but if you’re going to take rendering seriously, then you need to find a PC with adequate cooling.

When rendering my New York Earthquake animation my PC suffered permanent damage, because I used a standard PC case, stuffed into a tiny corner of the room in the middle of summer.  As a result, it overheated and refused to turn on.

But hey, at least it didn’t catch fire this.

Standard cases are suited more for air conditioned office environments, not prolonged rendering sessions in your stuffy bedroom. Take note :)

I’d recommend choosing a gaming case as these generally have better cooling than standard cases.

Hard Drive

Photo by Stuart Bryant

In terms of speed within blender, you aren’t going to see any noticeable difference by purchasing a faster hard drive. So let’s focus on stability instead…

The last thing you want is for your hard drive to fail, right? Well unfortunately hard drive failure is a sad fact of life so the best thing you can do is be prepared and create a backup.

And what’s the easiest way to do that you ask? Set up a RAID array.

A RAID array. It’s a system configuration that uses two physical hard drives to mirror each other, so that if one fails you always have a backup. All you need to do is purchase two identical hard drives and set it up in the BIOS settings. I highly recommend that you do this before the inevitable happens! ;)

My personal PC

Since so many people have asked what my specific PC specs are, here it is:

  • OS: Windows 7 64 Bit
  • CPU: Intel i7 950 3.06Ghz
  • RAM: 12GB Kingston 2000Mhz DDR3
  • GFX Card: Gigabyte Nvidia GTX 470 1280MB
  • HDD: 2 x 1TB Western Digital Sata 3 (RAID 1 array)
  • Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A
  • Case: Antec ‘Nine Hundred’ 750W
  • Monitor: 21″ Benq Widescreen
  • Keyboard: Logitech G15
  • Mouse: Microsoft basic optical mouse

Still not sure what to buy?

If you’re still unsure which PC components to purchase, then check out the Cycles Benchmark thread. It’s currently 42 pages long and is dedicated to benchmarking PCs with Cycles.

Thanks for reading! :) If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy 4 Easy Ways to Speed Up Cycles.

Tags: ,

About Andrew Price

User of Blender for 9+ years. I've written tutorials for 3d World Magazine and spoken at three Blender conferences. My goal is to help artists get employed in the industry by making training accessible and easy to understand. I'm an Aussie and I live in South Korea ;)
  • Mr.Flash

    Cool! Big thanks to you, Andrew! Your tips helped me choose hardware for my future 3D-modelling computer.

  • Oral

    Hi,
    Are there any big differences between Win 7 and Win 8 ? Which one is the best fit for 3D design ?

    Thank you,

    • http://www.facebook.com/arzulu.poster.3 Arzulu Poster

      I have windows 8, and used to use windows 7. Trust me, no matter what crap you hear, windows 8 is much better than windows 7. For blender, I’d say use windows 8, because it handles resources better, and uses less overall.

  • Veezen

    Hi, I have question. Is it good idea, to buy Gigabyte GTX 660 (non-ti) 2GB for Cycles? I have limited budget for my GPU.

    • Brendon

      Most any current Nvidia GPU including the 660 would be great for blender, I have a GTX 560 TI 1280 MB, and it renders way faster than my CPU (i7 3770K)

      But there are currently certain shaders that only work with CPU rendering ( Sub Surface Scattering).

    • http://www.facebook.com/arzulu.poster.3 Arzulu Poster

      I use the 650, which does a decent job, the 660 would do a fine job. The 600 series cards from nividia overclock very well, so I’d just get the 660 and overclock a bit.

  • Donnalyn Muellerto

    this Ultimate Guide to Buying a Computer for Blender is a must read before buying a computer.

    Washington Personal Injury Lawyer

  • james

    RAM: 12GB Kingston 2000Mhz DDR3? you have a lots or RAM and you got a good PC unit.

    Washington State
    Speeding Ticket Attorney

    • Piolo

      “buying a $4000 computer” is there actually 4K price for a computer? probably a high-end or a computer for gaming. Piolo Segura of http://www.katstar.com

      • Douglas E Knapp

        Take a look at a good graphics workstation.

        HP Quadro 6000 Graphics Card
        $7,333.99, Price:$1,939.99, You Save:$5,394.00
        LOL, right?

        Wacom Intuos5 Touch Medium Pen Tablet
        $324.99

        32 gb ram
        $270

        2 3tb drives
        $300

        and a SSD 512GB crucial (Andrew, you are missing out, if you don’t have one of these!)
        $385

        ASUS P8Z77-V PRO LGA 1155 Intel Z77 HDMI SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
        $200

        Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011
        $570

        two 24IN LCD 1920X1200 1000:1 324I Dvid HDmi 6MS 10BIT Pips Gamutby LaCie
        $1,300
        $1,300

        Datacolor Spyder4Elite S4EL100 Colorimeter for Display Calibration by Datacolor
        Price:$219.00, massively overlooked by amateurs!

        Antec Extended ATX Case P193 V3
        $179.99

        And for your films don’t forget to buy a good stereo to pump out that surround sound to your 7.5 speakers. I will drop the price here but it can be a big cost.
        $500 not included in total

        Also a good DSLR by canon or nikon (hint, by a nikon d50 on ebay !! Great camera for $50 plus a 16-70mm and a 70-200mm objective and a few flashes and stands)
        $3000 not included in total

        Total about $7000!! You can drop about 4000 from that price by going cheap with a gaming card and monitor and SSD but still . . .

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Donnalyn

    more and more hightech gadgets are coming out, these gadgets are unexpected and it is amazing! Destin FL Fishing Charters

  • WChargin

    While Ubuntu may be a pain, I find Mint (www.linuxmint.org) to be a joy; I would highly recommend it.

  • Coldid

    I like video card and the motherboard looks awesome.

    M & M Tours Skagway Alaska

  • Hingall

    Awesome hardware I also like the cpu case its very unique.

    Xeon

  • milky1018

    It’s funny to see some post nowadays about computers. I can say it has also become a universal language for people.
    http://www.spectra.com

  • Erik

    Hey, I almost finished building up my new System.
    But although I have 16gb G.Skill ripjaws 1866Mhz Blender is just using about 1gb while baking fluids for example.
    Is there a limitation at the User Preferences to say Blender that it is “allowed” to use for example 10 gb?
    Or is it just bottlenecked by other hardware?

    -My System-

    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
    CPU: Intel i5 3570k 3,8Ghz
    RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 1866Mhz
    GPU: KFA² GTX 660 ti OC 3gb Ram
    SSD: 128gb Crucial M4
    HDD: 1TB don’t now the brand right now
    Motherboard: Asrock z77 Pro-4
    Case: Aerocool Xpredator

    At the moment the desktop run’s over an gt 430 but I will buy a gtx 260 (for desktop) and a 560 or 570 as 2nd rendering card
    I’m using the 660 because of the 3gb ram even if I have ab bit longer rendertimes.

    sd

  • Joey Thomas

    Thank you for this info. I am struggling with Windows 8, and have grown to dislike it so much that my new computer was going to be one of the new iMac computers. Now, I see a lot of negativity here about the iMac. I don’t want to learn a new operating system. I spend way too much time just trying to get Windows to work. I had miserable experiences with Android and so I went to the iPhone, and old technology or not, it just works. My issue with the iMac is that the GPU is already a bit outdated, but that is going to happen no matter what I get. Thanks

  • Simon

    Hi Andrew and everyone else,

    This is my first post or comment re Blender. I currently use an old version of Max and Vray and want to learn Blender. I have just ordered a Dell Alienware Aurora 4 with dual 2GB GTX-680′s…………. However I am concerned with what I have read re this card here and elsewhere. Even though it’s designed as a gaming pc surely if the contents in the box are good it should work the same for rendering and Adobe as a conventional commercial pc like a Precision?? Should I cancel the order and get my money back? Does the GTX-680 not work? Many thanks

    • Brendon

      The GTX 680 should work no problems, Nvidia just cut back its CUDA performance compared to the previous GTX 500 series GPUs. Two 680′s should render faster than a single gpu, but the way SLI works, the memory is tied to the card (2GB + 2GB = 2GB total, not 4)

      Hope this helps,

      • Simon

        Thanks Brendon, would you suggest selling the 680′s and get a 3gb 580 or a quadro fx4800 instead?

        • Brendon

          I cant speak to the performance of the quadro, but usually the more memory is better, and from the quick search i did the GPU in the 580 is a couple generations newer, From what i can see the 580 should be better than the 4800.

          The single 580 3GB vs 2 680′s, harder to tell, the extra gig of ram would be nice but i dont know the speed difference, either will be fast for rendering

          I have a GTX 560 with 1280 MB ram and its great from small/med scenes but large complex scenes crash it regularly (working on an entry for Blenderguru Sci Fi competition)

          If you already have the 680′s, try em out,

  • Yash Aggarwal

    Blender was crashing again and again and i had no clue that what might have caused it,now I Know RAM was the villain.Thanks

  • Erik Jahner

    I have just started with Blender and have been trying to do some nature scenes. I have a Mac Air with NVIDIA GeForce 320M 256 MB, This seems really slow to me. Through my work I can get a large mac discount so I want to stay with Mac. However, I am trying to decide which one. DOes anybody know if there is a large difference between NVIDIA GeForce 640M 512 MB and NVIDIA GeForce 650M 512 MB in terms of render times. Or is it worth it to spend the extra few hundred for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M with 512MB. Not sure how to compare these. Any suggestions?

    • Brendon

      The 660M would be the best choice for rendering, I have GT 540 in my windows laptop (windows)and it runs blender great. From what i can tell the GT 540 in my laptop is still faster than i7 in my Desktop computer. Any of the gpu’s you pick will be faster than CPU, According to notebookckeck(dot)net they all have the same amount of Shaders, the difference is Core Speed and Memory Speed, 660 has just a little faster core (100Mhz faster) but the memory is faster by a slight margin. So depending on the cost difference the 660 could be worth it but the 650 wouldnt be that far behind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/raphael.d.barros Raphael De Araújo Barros

    Really awesome article Andrew, thank you very much :D

    But I have a question: I’m thinking about buying a notebook to use Blender when I’m not at home, but I’m a bit confused of what I should prioritize, for example: aside from rendering, what are the other roles that the CPU and GPU have in Blender? What’s the most important of the two (or three, if you count RAM) to the 3D View performance?

    I’m in doubt if I should get an i7 3630QM + Geforce 640m(1GB) or an
    i5 3210M + Geforce 650m(2GB).

    • Brendon

      i know its been a while since you posted this but if you are still deciding
      For the 3d view performance either will be fine for most tasks,

      the 650 2gb would a great laptop for most blender needs but most i5 are dual core with hyperthreading where the i7 is true Quad core. If you plan on doing physics/fluid simulations then the i7 would be betterl but the i5 would still be quite capable. Both would be good (better than my blender laptop i5 with gt 540 1GB)

  • Dominick

    Hi Anderw, could you update the PC specs for this page to me. (02/20/2013) was also thinking of buying this laptop http://www.toshibadirect.com/td/b2c/cdetland.to?poid=2000044488 but I am concerned about overheating. I plan to create animation with it. Thanks

  • John Caldwell

    Hi everyone. I have been a loyal Mac user for years, but I realize Macs are way overpriced. I want to get a new system that can do anything I want with Blender and Unity. As a member of Sam’s Club in Ft Lauderdale Florida, I can get (for under a thousand dollars) an HP Envy Standalone computer, model h8-1417c i7 with 12 gigs of ram, 2 TB hard drive, Intel core i7-3770, with an Nvidia GE Force GT630 graphics card with 2 gigs of memory and DirectX 11 which supports up to 2 displays and Blue Ray. Can anyone think of a reason why I should not buy this computer?

  • wulan

    hi Andrew,may I ask you that is there a better graphic card than gtx 470 for cycles except the Tesla (Tesla is to dear !) ?? thanks !

    • Douglas E Knapp

      Buy a GeForce GTX Titan.
      LOL.

  • forestmedina

    Hi Andrew, thanks so much for all you work, i am buying a new pc now and this is a important information, i would take all the advices except for the one about Windows there are things that i do in 2 seconds on linux, but take me hours to do in windows XD. now seriously i am happy you are given another chance to Linux is a great SO. Sorry for my English

  • http://twitter.com/ilovepats2000 William Stewart

    What I found was best for blnder is an ubuntu distro known as unbuntu studio. It has blender build in but the only problem is tht it only get slightly outdated versiond of blwser. The good thing is that this can be fixed with a few simple terminal commands. I find this operating system to be better also because it is optimized for running multiple task. I only have 1 gb of ram abd a 1.8 ghz dual core porsessir but with this i can run hair physics sinulation of about 3000 hairs with 10 diffrent bending pounts and render it in under 10 minutes. I am hoping to updrade my computer because my current specs are not enough to handle complicated tasks and theres a bug in blender with slow computers where if tou crash while editing an object sometimes it gets stuck like that abd tou cannot open the program. It basicly breaks it and you have to use termianl ti fix it but i think they fixed that in blender 2.65a. Ubuntu studio is a very good option for those who want to use linux and blender and have very limited prosessing power. It is also good for people who have high powered computers because of linuxs ability to adapt to most setups.

  • Santiago Shang

    Damned… I have to buy Nvidia anyways… Oh… Ubuntu is not the easiest linux hehehe… I’ve used in the past… And I think that now the easiest is openSuse. However it’s just what u want to use.

    • Douglas E Knapp

      Not really. The OS is a big factor in productivity and speed of blender.
      I run Sabayon KDE. You never need to upgrade it! It is super fast! It has the most updated drivers and program. It is not really aimed at beginners but for me it is WAY easier than Kubuntu ever was.

  • Jogai

    As a windows user I found KDE way easier to switch to. In combination with a distro that supports more out of the box, like Linux Mint or Sabayon, it will be a lot easier.

  • ThreeViews

    I wanted to take the time to thank you for your great service to the Blender community. Articles like this are a great side line to the tutorials and course study that you provide. I also appreciate that you have taken the time to print out the tutorials as well the video reference. Thanks for listening.

  • http://www.facebook.com/justin.mcconnell.587 Justin Mcconnell

    Ready to have your mind BLOWN

    My build
    Window XP x64
    Asus KGPE-D16 Server MotherBoard w Dual Socket G34
    AMD Opteron 6282 SE 2.6ghz processor with 16 cores and 24.5MB of cache
    Total CPU 32 cores at combined 5.0-5.5ghz with 49MB of cpu cache
    ( will render almost half the scene at a time unless i run default then it will render 2 scenes at a time )

    16 X 16GB ram (256GB) Break Down
    8 sticks with high computation 8 sticks with high speed

    PNY VCQ6000-PB Quadro 6000 6GB 384bit GDDR5 Graphics Card (12GB Total)

    ~7TB Onboard Storage space break down
    Pike Raid Management ( currently running RAID 105 or 104 I cant remember )
    3 raid cells with 2 extra storage disks running Raid 0
    Each raid cell break down
    3TB index
    2TB index
    2 X 1TB Storage

    plus another home made NAS Drive set up with another ~10TB running RAID 100

    Server case with 10 X 120cm fans blowing 252cfm + 2 exaust impellers(just to direct flow)
    1350W Power supply

    sound card & Video/TV Tuner for added input and output support(I cant find my tuner on newegg)

    Everything else is pretty Basic

    oh also when installing the CPU and Cooler i took a mix of Arctic Silver and Arctic Alumina for a thermal compound
    I find a heat-sink with an aluminum base cools better than a copper one

    Links for Equipment
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131643 (motherboard)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113039 (CPU)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820139930 (mem 1)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820239275 (mem 2)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133347 (graphics card)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816110057 (Pike)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148844 (index 1 hard drive)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148619 (index 2 hard drive)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226360 (Storage hard drive)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829271001 (sound card)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811103042 (Case)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817194092 (Power Supply)

    • http://www.facebook.com/tomasz.kraszewski.7 Tomasz Kraszewski

      forget to add “small nuke plant next to my house” :P

      • e92m3

        “1350W Power supply”

        Actually, it’s a very efficient system for such computational horsepower. Also, he has an upgrade path to the new piledriver 16 core Opterons (also g34), significantly improving his already unbeatable compute performance per $ workstation.

        • http://www.facebook.com/justin.mcconnell.587 Justin Mcconnell

          when I get to it I will check out that card. though Ive looked into other non Nvidia systems, and from what I have seen the only upside is the internal clocks are slightly faster but with less cores. scraping drivers can be a pain so I like to stick to one manufacture. I also run XP X64 and there isnt many other high end manufactures that support my os, everyone is geared up for the two newest versions of Windows.(or should I say three because there is a new Windows Server OS out there)

      • http://www.facebook.com/justin.mcconnell.587 Justin Mcconnell

        Yeah she is a hungry beast.

  • http://www.facebook.com/tomasz.kraszewski.7 Tomasz Kraszewski

    Hi Andrew, Lately i’ve bought GTX 660Ti 3GB and i was dissapointed with performance in handling bigger scene. I changed My FirePro v7800 to this gtx and i was lucky not to sell my FirePro. Did some reserch and it occures that if you have Win 7 and motherboard with 2 PCI-E x16 slots, you can install two different cards in your PC. And right now i’m running my Firepro as a display card and GTX as rendering GPU.

    If someone interested, my current spec is:
    OS: Win 7 Pro x64
    CPU: Phenom II x6 1055T
    RAM: 16GB Kingston 1600 DDR3 HyperX RED
    Graphics:
    1. Display: ATI/AMD FirePro v7800 2GB
    2. rendering GPU: Gigabyte GTX 660Ti 3GB OC
    HDD: Samsung Spinpoint 500GB (planning to make 1SSD + RAID)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3
    Case: ASUS (don’t remember model)
    Monitor: 3xBenq G2220HD 21,5″ in Eyefinity enabled.
    Keyboard: Logitech K350 Wireless
    Mouse: A4Tech X-750GreenFire
    Extra pointing device: 3Dconnexion Space Pilot.

  • das

    seriously dude, after reading your comments about linux I submit to you that you don’t have the slightest clue of what you’re talking about

  • Mikecore3D

    Great article, i share my personal configuration: Intel core i5 2320 3.0ghz 8gb corsair 1600mhz, gtx 550ti amp, i need to update my case and display

  • http://profiles.google.com/jelmorini Nicola Jelmorini

    It’s really sad to note that nowadays there is still people that state that Linux it’s all about complicated terminal commands :-(

    That’s misinformation, I’m sorry buddy.

    • http://www.facebook.com/wjbarber William Barber

      Sorry, but I’m a linux user… and that is just wrong. While the operating system has come a long long way in recent years (hell even recent months on some things)… it still has a long way to go before the terminal is a thing of the past. Saying otherwise is just plain wishful thinking :D

      • Francisco Martinez

        In my opinion, the terminal will never be a thing of the past. For most terminal applications there’s a graphical front-end. Actually, for almost all of them. The terminal’s advantage is its ridiculously extreme flexibility compared to what a front-end can do.
        You’re not obliged to use it, though :)
        I survived the first months of using Linux with Ubuntu, and I almost never touched the terminal.

        • Name

          And there are so many tutorials online that you don’t have to have any terminal knowlege. I know nothing about the terminal but I still use it.

    • Douglas E Knapp

      I use Sabyon KDE and almost never use the terminal unless I want to do something the smart and easy way. BTW really good MS people also do most things by the terminal.

      I use the terminal to for: locate, htop, ping, vim (because I like it, there are 1000 text editor like kate that are great on the desktop).

      Lets face it, all of us use Blender, Krita and a web browser 99.9% of the time. OK, some of us use Gimp, Photoshop or Mypaint. :-)

  • http://www.facebook.com/cornelius.wiens.7 Cornelius Wiens

    In regards to your comment “The most expensive GPU will generally offer the best performance” Yesterday I upgraded my GTX580 1.5GB to a GTX680 4GB card. This 680 has a much faster GPU, way more memory but to my amazement it rendered the BMW benchmark scene 3 seconds faster. $770 for 3 second increase lol.

    My guess is blender 2.65a doesn’t yet support cuda kernel 3.0. I was thinking of returning the 680 but after reading your comment about memory limitations I think I might hang on to it, for stability reasons when it comes to large scenes.

    • http://www.facebook.com/tomasz.kraszewski.7 Tomasz Kraszewski

      Sad fact is that nVidia is “plaing” around with their customers. Kepler architecture is less efficient than older 5series :( Hope this is only a driver issue and it will improve in time.

    • Simon

      Hi Andrew and Cornelieus,

      This is my first post or comment re Blender. I currently use an old version of Max and Vray and want to learn Blender. I have just ordered a Dell Alienware Aurora 4 with dual 2GB GTX-680′s…………. However I am concerned with what I have read re this card here and elsewhere. Even though it’s designed as a gaming pc surely if the contents in the box are good it should work the same for rendering and Adobe as a conventional commercial pc like a Precision?? Should I cancel the order and get my money back? Does the GTX-680 not work? Many thanks

  • Chris F.

    I am using Blender on Linux for a few month now, and it feels great. There are also some benchmarks out there claiming Blender UI and rendering works in most cases a bit faster on Linux then on windows.I recommend NOT the vanilla Ubuntu or Kubuntu, but Xubuntu, Lubuntu or Mint with Gnome instead. It seems the overall OpenGL performance is slighty better on these flavours, which use other window managers then KDE and Unity, as they are used by default on Ubuntu and Kubuntu.

  • jackblack

    Andrew, I’ve never had to go into the terminal to hook up a wired lan, I just plugf it in and it sees it.

    • swfblade

      just because you have never, doesn’t mean that others wouldn’t have this issue. One thing I’ve learnt from working in IT over the years, is that no matter what OS you use, the PC will ALWAYS want to do its own thing!!

  • Jacob Schwartz

    I’ve got just a couple tips for those who both read the comments and are looking to build a new computer. ;)

    1.) Yeah, I’m trying to avoid repeating previous linux related comments below, but try out ubuntu 12.04 or 12.10. You’ll be surprised how far it’s come. Just install gnome-shell and then not use Unity for your desktop.

    2.) I very recently built a new computer to replace my old 2004 workstation. I found that the best processor I could buy would be the i7 or the highest end i5 3570K. I was looking for overclockability, cache, power, and number of cores/threads. I decided not to go with the high end AMD 8350 because intel somehow outperforms it in the area of floating point calculation, which is most important to graphics/3d work. After looking through the specs of the processors, I settled on the i7 3770K. It’s overclockable, runs at 3.5 GHz and boosts to 3.9, 8mb of cache, 4 cores/8 threads, and I find it regularly at microcenter for about $230 instead of the price I find everywhere else which is $400. I think found the best cheapest solution and so far I can’t complain at all.

    3.) Cases help a lot! But, that’s not the end of the story. I bought my new case before the rest of my parts, so I put the old computer guts into it to see how it’d all fit in. Turns out, that the lousy heatsink that I had on the old cpu performed 10 degrees cooler than the old case. Big improvement. However, The cpu heatsink has HUGE role to play in keeping your system alive. Get a good one; do your research.

    4.) Final note: Drive speed really does actually play a role in user experience in Blender. All the smoke/fire/particle simulations have to be cached to disk when you bake. Even when you’re using heavy compression on the cache files, there’s still a huge amount of data that has to get written to disk for every frame computed. I’m willing to go out on a limb and suggest that a very good portion of time spent calculating each frame of a simulation is data being stored to disk, so the faster your drive can be written to, the faster your simulations will go. Not to mention loading times for other large blend files and textures.

    That’s all from me :)
    -Jacob

    • Łukasz Semler

      Ad.1) Or maybe Mint 14 with Cinnamon

      Ad.2) FX-8350 is nearly as fast as i7-3770K ( at least in Blender [ after pclab.pl 214s vs 193s ] & 3DS Max [ 167s vs 165s ] & can overclock up to 5,3GHz ( water cooling needed ).
      Mental Ray & VRay http://www.behardware.com/articles/880-7/amd-fx-8350-review-is-amd-back.html
      FX8350 is about 40% cheaper than i7-3770K so it’s no-brainer to Me.
      The only drawback is power consumption ( nearly 80W more at full workload ).

      Łukasz

  • Arne_B

    This is nothing else than a winblows fanboy post.
    Ubuntu is by far the easiest Linux distribution to use.
    It can’t get any easier than that.

  • filipc

    Does anyone know if a convertible ultrabook with a GPU is coming ?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrabook#cite_note-61

  • dudeplayer

    Warning concidering graphics cards:
    Even though when you look at the specs of the new 600 series of nvidia graphics cards it looks as if they would outperform the old series by far, this is not true.
    So buy a card of the 500 or 400 series for the best performance per $.
    Nvidia has increased the amount of CUDA cores but decreased their power, which helps in Games, but is not good for cycles.

  • http://twitter.com/martin_lindelof Martin Lindelöf

    I think for storage, you should go as I did when switching back to PC/LNX from Mac. 1 SSD 128GB or 256GB for system + apps (SSD are virtually failsafe from hardware failure. works really fast!)

    and 2+2Tb in Hardware RAID. this was a bit hussle to set up but i didn’t want Software raid since its using CPU.

    On ubuntu i used gparted partitioner and posted hwoto on askubuntu since many others seemed to have problem to get HW raid to work.